Final answer:
The mixed-motive conflict management style is most effective because it seeks win-win situations, encourages cooperative problem-solving, and aligns with the collaborative and inclusive values of Theory Y management.
Step-by-step explanation:
The mixed-motive conflict management style is considered to be the most effective because it seeks win-win situations for everyone involved. This approach aligns with the collaborative nature of conflict resolution, where exploring competing values can foster mutual understanding and agreement over appropriate decisions. In this style, conflict is not seen as a zero-sum game, but rather as an opportunity for all parties to grow, learn, and innovate, ultimately leading to more productive and satisfying outcomes for the stakeholders involved.
Theory Y, which posits that employees seek inner satisfaction and fulfillment from their work, supports the idea that people function better when they are involved in decision-making processes. This inclusive management approach can lead to more effective conflict resolution since employees feel valued and are motivated to cooperate and find solutions that benefit the collective. Additionally, Theory Y workplaces often foster environments where conflicts can be addressed constructively, as employees are more likely to be committed to the organization's success and well-being.
Ultimately, the mixed-motive conflict management style aligns with the goals and values of a firm, seeking outcomes that are beneficial for the firm and its employees, thus fulfilling option B from the multiple-choice question. It neither focuses on achieving productivity at any cost (avoiding option E) nor does it prioritize winning at the expense of others (dismissing option C). Instead, it harmonizes organizational output with the well-being of individuals, a key factor in easing conflict and enhancing overall performance.