Final answer:
The whaling debate involves arguments on cultural tradition and economic benefits versus the importance of oceanic biodiversity and sustainability. Pro-whaling groups use political lobbying and stress cultural significance, while anti-whaling advocates campaign publicly and push for stricter laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
The debate around whaling encompasses various arguments for and against the practice, often influenced by environmental, economic, ethical, and cultural perspectives. Proponents of whaling often argue from a standpoint of cultural tradition and economic benefits, as in some communities, whaling is a tradition that has been practiced for generations and provides a source of income and food. On the ecological side, advocates for whale protection stress the importance of maintaining oceanic biodiversity and the role of whales in marine ecosystems. They also reference the endangered status of many whale species and the unsustainable nature of commercial whaling practices that have historically led to near extinction for some species.
The tactics used by those in favor of whaling may include political lobbying, promoting sustainable whaling practices, and highlighting the cultural importance of whaling to certain indigenous populations. Those opposed to whaling use various strategies such as public campaigns, as seen with Animal Planet's show 'Whale Wars', direct action by intercepting whaling ships, and advocating for stronger international laws and agreements, like the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Madrid Protocol) that bans mining and economic activities detrimental to whales in Antarctica.