Final answer:
The debate over whether a fetus is a human person is addressed through diverse philosophical arguments and legal interpretations, weighing personhood against the pregnant person's rights to bodily autonomy.
Step-by-step explanation:
In analyzing the abortion issue, the handling of whether the fetus is a human person is addressed somewhat indirectly through philosophical arguments and legal perspectives; this analysis does not speak on behalf of any single person's views but reviews general positions in the debate. Philosophers such as Warren argue that a fetus does not meet personhood criteria, hence considering abortion morally permissible under all circumstances. On the contrary, others, like Dworkin, believe that full moral status is derived simply from being human. Moreover, Judith Jarvis Thomson's thought experiment about the famous violinist is often used to argue that even if a fetus has a right to life, this does not necessarily override the pregnant person's right to bodily autonomy. Throughout history, such as the landmark Roe v. Wade case, the legal system has grappled with these beliefs to establish a balance between protecting potential human life and respecting a woman's rights.