157k views
4 votes
Given the following premises:
1. Q ⊃ (A ∨ ∼T)
2. T
3. A ∨ ∼T

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The argument is valid.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given premises are:

  1. Q → (A ∨ ∼T)
  2. T
  3. A ∨ ∼T

To evaluate the validity of the argument, we can use the method of modus ponens. Modus ponens states that if we have a conditional statement (P → Q) and we know that P is true, then we can conclude that Q is true. In this case, we can observe that the first premise is a conditional statement, with Q as the antecedent and (A ∨ ∼T) as the consequent. The second premise tells us that T is true. By applying modus ponens, we can conclude that (A ∨ ∼T) is also true. The third premise confirms that either A or ∼T is true. Therefore, the argument is valid.

User Aniello
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories