Final answer:
Believing that adding an extra $100 and $1000 to expense statements are equally wrong demonstrates a low level of values maturity, likely the first level, where the severity of actions is not well understood.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you added an extra $100 to your expense statement and Sara added an extra $1000 to her expense statement, and you believe both of you are equally wrong despite the difference in amounts, this suggests a misunderstanding of ethical values within a business context. In terms of values maturity, this could point to the first level of maturity, where a person might not fully comprehend the severity of their actions in comparison to ethics or company policies, or they might believe that any form of infraction is equally wrong, regardless of scale.
Values maturity typically involves recognizing that the magnitude and impact of one's actions hold significance. Hence, judging equal wrongness in the face of a ten-fold discrepancy in the inflated amounts suggests a lack of maturity in ethical understanding. The fact that both actions violate company policy indicates that there is at least an awareness of right and wrong, but the inability to distinguish between the severity of the infractions implies first level development where nuances in ethical behavior are not fully appreciated.