Final answer:
The assertion is false; low uncertainty-avoidance societies have flexible work environments and few strict regulations, whereas high uncertainty societies, like France, have stringent rules that may inhibit hiring and contribute to higher unemployment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that in societies with low uncertainty-avoidance, companies emphasize stable careers and produce many rules to regulate worker actions and minimize ambiguity is false. Societies characterized by low uncertainty-avoidance tend to have more flexible and less structured workplace environments. Businesses in these societies are less likely to impose strict rules and regulations or to emphasize stable, long-term careers. In contrast, high uncertainty-avoidance societies are more likely to create stringent rules and focus on job security to manage the anxiety associated with uncertainty. Labor laws that impose heavy costs on businesses for firing workers, as seen in France, tend to limit employment and increase the natural rate of unemployment because these laws encourage businesses to restrict hiring to avoid potential future costs associated with layoffs. These observations contrast with the values of low uncertainty-avoidance cultures, where less emphasis is placed on formalized rules, and more on flexibility and adaptability within the workforce.