Final answer:
In a sublease situation, the sublessor remains liable for damages caused by the sublessee. Whether a lessor can terminate the lease if there was no provision for subletting depends on the original lease terms and local laws. Typically, the sublessee pays rent to the sublessor, not the lessor.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the case of a sublease, the correct statement is that the sublessor remains liable for damages caused by the sublessee. This means that the original tenant, who is subletting the property to a new tenant (sublessee), still holds the responsibility for the leased property's condition and is obligated to pay any damages to the lessor (landlord or property owner) unless an alternative agreement has been made.
If the lease agreement does not allow subletting and the tenant sublets the property anyway, the sublease could be considered invalid. However, whether the lessor can terminate the original lease depends on the terms specified in the lease agreement and the local laws governing tenancy. The situation may not always lead to lease termination, and it often requires legal procedures to resolve.
With regards to rent payment, the sublessee typically pays rent to the sublessor, not directly to the lessor. However, this may vary based on the terms agreed upon in the sublease contract.