Final answer:
To track ethics violations objectively and consistently, it's effective to use an internal system defined by internal and external stakeholders or risk matrices similar to those in cybersecurity, instead of relying on a single individual. Tools like the academic integrity slider can align individual practices with established ethics policies.
Step-by-step explanation:
To ensure that the tracking of the severity of ethics violations is objective and consistent, it is not advisable to have a single person do the tracking, as this could lead to bias. Instead, an effective approach would be to use an internal system with a limited set of menu options defined by a group of both internal and external stakeholders.
This approach allows for a structured and standardized way of classifying and reporting ethical issues. Another method is using risk matrices similar to those used in cybersecurity. These matrices can help in assessing the potential impact and likelihood of ethics violations, providing a more objective evaluation.
They enable the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks associated with ethical misconduct, which can result in a more consistent handling across the organization. Professional organizations and academic institutions often provide additional guidelines and tools, such as the academic integrity slider, to help align the practices of individuals and groups with established ethical standards and policies.
It's important for individuals and organizations to review and adhere to these guidelines to maintain integrity and prevent ethics violations in their work.