Final answer:
The statement implies an innate quality for leadership, with historical contexts including hereditary succession and charismatic leadership that contributes to authority. Charismatic leaders often become prominent in times of crisis, gaining loyalty due to personal qualities and the perceived rightfulness of their authority.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "She/he is born to be a leader" suggests a predetermination or innate capacity for leadership, often linked with historical concepts of hereditary succession and charismatic leadership. Throughout history, positions of ultimate authority were frequently obtained through hereditary succession, supported by tradition and heritage, which were considered legitimate means of obtaining authority. Charismatic leaders commanded power and loyalty often due to their personal qualities and the perceived rightfulness of their authority.
Leaders in this context are seen as goal-oriented, focusing on accomplishing tasks. The interpretation of history referred to here assumes that history can be viewed primarily through the lives and choices of leaders, a theory that posits organizations are ruled by a few elites. Charismatic leadership can either be socialized—serving collective interests and empowering others—or personalized, where the leader relies on personal approval or rejection by followers.
Charismatic leadership is also connected to the ability to rise to the forefront during crises, bring order to chaos, and cultivate a personality cult through devotion and loyalty. Leaders like Stalin have embodied these characteristics, displaying their leadership as benevolent while also emphasizing their prowess as a strong military strategist.