Final answer:
The sequence of steps for creating output in a PostScript workflow, like the engineering design and writing processes, is typically recursive and iterative, involving multiple revisions rather than a strict linear progression.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proper sequence of steps for creating output in a PostScript workflow is often perceived as a linear process. However, similar to the engineering design process and the writing process, it may not strictly follow a sequential path. In practice, designers and writers may need to revisit previous steps multiple times to refine their work and reach a satisfactory outcome.
In a PostScript workflow, the output generation can involve multiple revisions and feedback cycles. For instance, after the initial design or draft, there might be a need to adjust for errors or incorporate new requirements, leading to several iterations of editing and review before the final output is produced. This reflects a more recursive approach, instead of a strict linear progression.
Writing and design workflows tend to share this iterative characteristic. What is important to note is that the process can be messy and nonlinear, with progress often being made through a cycle of continuous improvement and adaptation, as opposed to a one-way march from start to finish.