Final answer:
Option B, stating that Red Robin provides two-week training to new employees, undermines the necessity of achievement tests since it implies the company values training and adaptability over prior achievements. Red Robin’s approach to hiring also suggests a focus on practical, real-world skills rather than standardized test performance.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which option, if true, would undermine the argument that Red Robin should use achievement tests in the employee selection process. The option that most directly undermines the argument is B, which states that Red Robin provides a two-week training session to all new hires, who are frequently college students with little experience in the restaurant industry. This suggests that Red Robin values the ability to train employees in their specific culture and service principles over prior achievement, which casts doubt on the necessity of achievement tests for selection.
Adding achievement tests into the hiring process may not align with the core values of honor, integrity, having fun, and continually seeking knowledge or reflect the practical skills needed as depicted in Jerry Newman's observations regarding the demands of fast-food service roles, as well as the management's expectations for new hires to adapt to the restaurant’s specific service model.
Another factor to consider is that the restaurant industry often values real-world experience and the ability to handle pressure, according to a pharmaceutical executive cited by Newman. Implementing achievement tests may overlook the potential of individuals who possess these desirable attributes but may not perform well on standardized tests.