Final answer:
The Universal Guidelines for AI can be vague and allow room for interpretation, which makes them fall short in addressing specific ethical dilemmas. They lack the detailed procedures needed for transparency and handling complex ethical scenarios in artificial intelligence applications.
Step-by-step explanation:
When it comes to the Universal Guidelines for AI (UGAI), they can fall short in ethical dilemmas primarily because of their vagueness and the potential room for interpretation.
This means that while the guidelines may set forth important principles, the application of these principles may not be clear-cut in complex ethical cases. For instance, the UGAI may emphasize corporate responsibility and the need for transparency, but they do not provide a concrete method on how to achieve total transparency in legal matters concerning artificial intelligence, which is necessary for effectively dealing with the potential dangers of artificial intelligence.
Furthermore, the nuances of specific scenarios or the unique contexts in which ethical decisions must be made are not always addressed in broad guidelines, leaving those who apply the UGAI without clear direction on how to proceed when faced with real-life moral conflicts. Additionally, applied ethics, which involves the application of moral principles to controversial issues, often requires a nuanced and context-specific approach that the UGAI may not adequately provide.