Final answer:
Three types of criteria when matching agents in an evaluative context include timeliness of research, relevance to subject, and quality of analysis. These criteria ensure that evaluations are up-to-date, directly relate to the subject matter, and are supported by evidence and sound reasoning.
Step-by-step explanation:
When matching agents in arts or media, such as in film criticism, three types of criteria that might be considered are timeliness of research, relevance to subject, and quality of the analysis. Timeliness ensures that the research or analysis is up to date with current trends and understanding. Relevance to subject confirms that the analysis is directly related to the central topic of the evaluation. Lastly, the quality of the analysis examines how in-depth and well-supported the evaluation is based on evidence and logical argumentation. Genres and subgenres also play a role, requiring the criteria to be adaptive based on audience expectations and the specific features of the subject matter.
Criterion 1: Timeliness of Research
The timeliness of research is essential, especially in fields subject to rapid change like technology or popular culture. Evaluations based on old data may not be representative of the current state and thus could mislead the audience.
Criterion 2: Relevance to Subject
Relevance is about ensuring that the analysis directly pertains to the core subject of the evaluation, without straying into irrelevant areas which could dilute the strength of the evaluation.
Criterion 3: Quality of Writing
Quality of analysis-writing demonstrates the intellectual rigor put into the evaluation. This includes clarity, accuracy, and how well it presents a persuasive argument supported by appropriate evidence.