Final answer:
Source-oriented medical records (SOMR) provide a comprehensive and chronological view of a patient's medical history, offering better coordination of care. Problem-oriented medical records (POMR) focus on specific medical issues but may result in fragmented documentation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The major advantage of source-oriented medical records (SOMR) over problem-oriented medical records (POMR) is that SOMR provides a comprehensive and chronological view of a patient's medical history. In SOMR, each healthcare professional documents their findings and observations separately, creating a detailed timeline of the patient's treatments and progress. This allows for better coordination of care and reduces the risk of missed or duplicated information.
On the other hand, POMR focuses on individual problems or diagnoses, making it easier to identify and address specific medical issues. However, it may not provide a complete picture of the patient's overall health and can lead to fragmented documentation.
In summary, the advantage of SOMR lies in its ability to provide a holistic view of the patient's medical history, while POMR is advantageous for its problem-centered approach.