Final answer:
The statement that information must be fragmented to be useful is false, as effective information is integrated and contextualized. Fragmented information often lacks the necessary context and completeness for correct interpretation and decision-making.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that information must be fragmented to be useful is false. Useful information is typically well-integrated and contextualized rather than fragmented. Information of high quality is accurate, relevant, and complete, presented in a way that users can interpret and apply it effectively. Fragmented information can lead to misunderstandings and incomplete analysis because it lacks context and may omit important details. It's crucial for information to be systematic and comprehensive, which is particularly important in fields like business decision-making, where having complete and integrated data is critical for sound analysis.For instance, when considering consumer data, it is not sufficient to look at fragmented pieces, such as individual purchase histories, without considering larger trends and behaviors that give the data context and meaning. Similarly, in scientific research, data needs to be well-rounded and contextual for proper interpretation.