Final answer:
The statement that juvenile delinquency is no longer difficult to measure due to technological advancements is false. Technologies do help but there remain significant challenges in accurately measuring juvenile delinquency.
Step-by-step explanation:
Advancements in technology can facilitate the measurement of many things, including crime rates, but saying that measuring juvenile delinquency is no longer difficult would be an overstatement. While technology provides tools such as data analytics and improved communication which aid in tracking and analyzing crime, there are still various challenges in accurately measuring juvenile delinquency. These can include underreporting, differences in law enforcement practices, and variations in definitions of delinquency across jurisdictions. Hence, the statement that due to advancements in technology, juvenile delinquency is no longer difficult to measure is false.
Regarding crime trends in the United States, the correct situation is that rates of violent crimes are decreasing, but there are more nonviolent crimes now than ever before. The temperance movement did indeed stem from new social conditions like increasing urbanization and immigration, making this statement true. Social disorganization theory posits that crime is most likely to occur in a community where neighbors don't know each other well. Lastly, it's false that voting rates in the United States are higher than in most democratic industrialized countries, as countries like Sweden and South Korea have higher voter turnouts.