Final answer:
When a real estate commissioner suspects a developer of fraudulent statements, options include issuing a desist and refrain order, revoking the public report, or seeking a restraining order, while eminent domain is not a remedial power for such cases.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the real estate commissioner believes a subdivision developer is making fraudulent statements, the commissioner has a few options available for addressing such conduct. First, the commissioner may issue a desist and refrain order to stop the deceptive practices immediately. Second, the commissioner has the authority to revoke the public report for the subdivision, effectively halting sales and marketing operations. Finally, the commissioner may seek a restraining order through the court to enforce compliance with laws and regulations. It's important to note that the use of eminent domain is not a remedy for fraudulent statements by a developer. Eminent domain is a power used traditionally to obtain property for public use, like infrastructure projects, and has been the subject of debate when used for economic redevelopment, such as in the notable Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London.