Final answer:
The statement about Mintzberg's entrepreneurial mode is false because this mode emphasizes proactive decision-making and entrepreneurial initiative, whereas "muddling through" is reflective of Lindblom's incrementalism, representing reactive and small-scale changes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Mintzberg's entrepreneurial mode is sometimes referred to as "muddling through" is False. Mintzberg's entrepreneurial mode is characterized by a proactive search for new opportunities, rather than being reactive. This mode emphasizes the leader's role as an entrepreneur who aggressively seeks to change the organization and takes bold actions to establish a vision for the future. It's not about muddling through; rather, it is about pioneering new paths and taking risks to drive the organization forward.
In contrast, the term "muddling through" is more closely associated with Lindblom's theory of incrementalism, where decisions are made through small, tactical changes rather than bold, strategic initiatives. This approach is indeed more reactive than proactive, allowing organizations to adapt gradually to changing circumstances without making major, disruptive changes.
It is important for companies to constantly seek ways to attract customers and improve efficiency as part of their growth imperative. By doing so, they can strive for sustainability and ultimate success within a market-oriented economy. However, decision-making in such an economy may involve a series of incremental choices rather than a single master plan, as firms have the liberty to make decisions based on their understanding of market forces and profitability.