116k views
4 votes
Which of the following BEST describes how a preferred provider organization (PPO) is less restrictive than a health maintenance organization (HMO)? A) a)More physicians to choose from

B) Lower out-of-pocket costs
C) Required primary care physician (PCP) referrals
D) Limited coverage for out-of-network services

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

A PPO is less restrictive than an HMO mainly because it provides patients with a larger selection of physicians and does not require PCP referrals for specialists, allowing more flexibility in healthcare choices.

Step-by-step explanation:

The choice between a Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) and a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) often comes down to the level of freedom patients have in selecting healthcare providers and managing their own care. A PPO is generally considered less restrictive than an HMO. This is because in a PPO, patients have more physicians to choose from and are not usually required to obtain referrals from a primary care physician (PCP) to see specialists, offering a wider network. Additionally, PPOs typically provide some coverage for out-of-network services, whereas HMOs often limit coverage strictly to in-network providers unless there is an emergency.

User Dan Noble
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories