Final answer:
Samuelson might disagree with Burtless's analysis of governmental spending for older adults due to overlooked private sector contributions, insufficient emphasis on federal spending, or a lack of international comparisons in the critique.
Step-by-step explanation:
Samuelson may disagree with Burtless's analysis regarding governmental spending for older adults for several reasons not outlined in the provided references. However, based on the information given, we can imply certain objections Samuelson might have:
- Ignored Private Sector: Samuelson might argue Burtless does not sufficiently recognize the role of private sector contributions to the welfare of older adults.
- Inadequate Emphasis on Federal Spending: Burtless may underemphasize the significance of federal spending on programs like Medicare and Social Security.
- Insufficient International Comparison: Samuelson may believe Burtless fails to consider how U.S. governmental spending on aging adults compares with other nations.
These points would suggest Samuelson feels there's a lack of comprehensive analysis in Burtless's critique of government spending directed at the elderly. Notably, Burtless also points out productivity concerns related to budget deficits from such spending, which Samuelson might argue oversimplifies the benefits and trade-offs of these expenditures.