Final answer:
A cashier should pay for the soda with personal funds,(option 4) which is the ethical choice per most company personal policies. If accused of theft over a cash drawer shortage, the cashier should demonstrate the accuracy of transactions, request an audit, and seek support while remaining calm.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the scenario where a cashier at Walbound decides to buy a soda to drink during her break, they should adhere to the personal policy set by the company. Option 1: Use her employee discount would allow the cashier to purchase the soda at a reduced price due to her position within the company. However, the most commonly accepted and ethical action would be Option 4: Pay with her personal funds. Charging it to the store's account or not paying at all could be seen as taking advantage of the company's resources inappropriately. While it's not mentioned if paying with cash falls under using personal funds, it is generally implied that whether by cash, credit, or debit, utilizing personal funds is the correct action in this scenario.
If a cashier has been wrongly labeled as a thief for their cash drawer coming up short, they should approach the issue carefully. Accusations of theft are serious, and an employee would need to demonstrate with records or receipts that all transactions have been handled correctly. It may also be wise to request an investigation or audit of the till to clear their name, and seek help from a manager or a union representative if available. Maintaining a calm and professional demeanor while dealing with the situation is crucial.