Final answer:
The statement is false; Samuel Adams led the resistance act known as the Boston Tea Party, which was a deliberate political protest against British taxation policies, and he supported the destruction of the tea.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Samuel Adams was appalled by the destruction of personal property at the Boston Tea Party is false. Samuel Adams was one of the leaders of the Sons of Liberty, the group that organized the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, as a protest against British taxation policies, specifically the Tea Act which allowed the British East India Company to sell tea to the colonies at a reduced rate, undercutting local merchants.
Adams, along with other Patriots, viewed the tea as a symbol of British tyranny and, as such, they destroyed the tea to make a political statement. The act was a protest against British policies and was meant to send a clear message to the British government. Therefore, Samuel Adams was not appalled but rather supportive of this act of defiance, which was a catalyst for further resistance leading up to the American Revolution.