130k views
0 votes
Saanvi is in a discussion with other classmates on the benefits of using Ayurveda to treat illness. Saanvi's classmates dismiss her views, saying that Ayurveda is a nonproven method of treatment. Which fact might Saanvi use to dispute her classmate's claim?

User Pinewood
by
7.1k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Saanvi can dispute her classmates' claim by highlighting the long history and tradition of Ayurveda, its recognition by the World Health Organization, and the scientific studies supporting its effectiveness.

If Saanvi wants to dispute her classmates' claim that Ayurveda is a nonproven method of treatment, she could mention that Ayurveda has a long history and tradition of use, spanning thousands of years. The fact that Ayurveda has been practiced for centuries suggests that it has stood the test of time and has been deemed effective by generations of practitioners. Additionally, Saanvi might point out that Ayurveda is recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a traditional system of medicine. This recognition indicates that Ayurveda has a level of credibility and acceptance on a global scale. Moreover, Saanvi could refer to scientific studies and research that support the efficacy of certain Ayurvedic treatments. While not all aspects of Ayurveda may have undergone rigorous scientific testing, there is a growing body of research supporting the effectiveness of certain Ayurvedic practices and herbal remedies. It's important for Saanvi to present her arguments calmly and be open to a constructive discussion, acknowledging that while Ayurveda has its merits, it may not be a one-size-fits-all solution, and a balanced approach to healthcare is often beneficial.

User Islam Emam
by
8.4k points
6 votes

Final answer:

Saanvi can argue for the benefits of Ayurveda by citing scientific studies on Ayurvedic herbs, advocating the principle of medical pluralism and ethnomedicine, and comparing it to historical shifts in medical practices.

Step-by-step explanation:

To counter her classmates' dismissal of Ayurveda, Saanvi could present the fact that scientific studies have recognized various Ayurvedic practices and herbal medicines for their health benefits. Ayurveda, which has been practiced in India for thousands of years, employs natural herbs and substances that have been studied for their medicinal properties.

For example, turmeric, a common ingredient in Ayurvedic medicine, contains curcumin, which has been shown in multiple studies to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.

Additionally, the principle of medical pluralism suggests that integrating traditional practices like Ayurveda with biomedicine may lead to more holistic and effective health care.

With the rise of medical anthropological perspectives, there's an increasing appreciation for ethnomedicine, recognizing that alternative medical systems can offer valid and beneficial approaches to healing alongside Western medicine.

Lastly, by citing historical cases like the former broad acceptance of bloodletting in Western medicine, which was later disproved, Saanvi could argue that medical practices evolve with time and that effective treatments can originate from various cultural backgrounds, including Ayurveda.

User John Cornell
by
7.5k points