Final answer:
Tablet A could score higher than Tablet B overall due to the weighting of the evaluation criteria, even if it did not score higher on each individual criterion. The weighted average reflects the combined effect of the scores and their respective weights.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Tablet A has a higher score than Tablet B on a weighted point evaluation system, there are a few possible scenarios regarding the evaluation criteria. From the options provided, if Tablet A scored higher on the overall evaluation, it does not necessarily mean that Tablet A scored higher than Tablet B on each individual criterion. Different criteria likely have different weights, and the overall score is based on a sum of the products of each individual score and its respective weight. This means that Tablet A could score higher on some criteria and lower on others but still come out with a higher weighted average than Tablet B. Therefore, based on the information provided, Option 4: "Tablet A scored lower on some evaluation criteria" is a possible situation, as the higher total score is due to the weighting of the points rather than consistent scoring across all criteria.