Final answer:
Technological change is often disruptive but seen as a necessary cost for progress. Organizations should adapt technology standards to be flexible and meet user needs. Blocking innovation is generally not supported in market economies.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the scenario of Techno Tron developing new scientific technology that increases efficiency, the debate centers around whether the U.S. government should protect existing firms from the disruptive effects of innovation. Most people in market economies would argue against blocking technological progress, as disruption is considered a necessary cost that fosters overall advancements and benefits in the long run. Embracing technological change means advocating for retraining and skill development, supporting research and development, and finding ways to adapt to new advancements rather than hindering progress to save outdated jobs or industries. The case of Techno Tron suggests that technology standards in an organization may become counterproductive if they are inflexible and require workarounds, highlighting that such standards must evolve to support user needs and promote productivity.