Final answer:
The statement about listed property pertains to tax law and is out of context within the historical true/false questions provided. The necessary and proper clause expanded national government power, the colonists objected to tax application rather than its principle, land acquisition was a key driver in U.S. Indian policy, and the market revolution brought significant changes to the U.S.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'All listed property is subject to the substantiation requirements of § 274' is actually discussing a matter of tax law pertaining to the need for taxpayers to substantiate expenses related to certain types of property, often referred to as listed property, under the Internal Revenue Code. However, this seems to be mixed with a set of true/false questions that touch on different historical events and policies.
For instance, the statement about the necessary and proper clause limiting the power of the national government is false. The necessary and proper clause, found in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, has been used to expand the powers of the national government rather than limiting it.
Similarly, the assertion that colonists objected to the application rather than the principle of taxation is true. The slogan 'no taxation without representation' encapsulates their main grievance, which was the lack of representation in Parliament when these taxes were being decided.
The notion that land acquisition was the primary motivator in early U.S. Indian policy is somewhat reductive, but many would argue it is true. It can be reasonably claimed that while other factors played a role, the acquisition of land was the driving force behind many policies.
Lastly, the market revolution did indeed bring many social and economic changes to the United States, so that statement is true.