Final answer:
The assertion that fraud examination teams must be segregated into financial and field investigation groups is false; a collaborative approach can yield better results, similar to how investigations in other fields like medicine and law enforcement operate.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that fraud examination teams should be broken down into two segregated groups: one that focuses on the financial side of the investigation and one that performs the investigatory field work is false. In practice, while specializations within a team can be beneficial, it’s not necessary to segregate these functions strictly. A more integrated approach can lead to more effective communication and comprehensive understanding of the case at hand. It's noteworthy to compare this approach to the investigation of a pandemic like COVID-19 or a robbery case, where different investigators may look at diverse aspects but work collaboratively towards a common goal of understanding and stopping the spread of the virus or crime.
The statement that fraud examination teams should be broken down into two segregated groups, one that focuses on the financial side of the investigation and one that performs the investigatory field work, is true.This practice of segregating the roles and responsibilities within a fraud examination team is known as division of labor. By splitting the team into specialized groups, it allows for a more efficient and effective investigation process.