Final answer:
The use of a time clock is False in suggesting no supervision is needed in the workplace. Time clocks facilitate monitoring punctuality but do not eliminate the need for managerial oversight regarding productivity and work procedures.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Because a time clock is used, no supervision is required when employees enter and leave the workplace' is False. The use of a time clock, an invention patented in 1888 by Willard Legrand Bundy, allows for a record of the exact times employees arrive and leave work, and thus contributed to the phrase 'punching the clock'. However, time clocks do not replace the need for supervision. Employees still need to be observed to ensure productivity standards and adherence to work procedures, which are enforced by managers.
Factory workers, in particular, have historically been required to follow strict schedules, and a time clock system is often used to enforce punctuality. This method contributes to a regimented labor environment where conformity to procedures and productivity levels are closely monitored. However, this does not eliminate the need for managerial oversight to address issues such as efficiency, quality of work, or adherence to safety regulations. Supervision remains crucial even in workplaces where time clocks are used.