Final answer:
True, the buyer's intended use of a property is relevant to title defects related to noncompliance with municipal land-use bylaws, particularly when it comes to zoning regulations. These regulations are vital for municipalities to direct development, and noncompliance can result in legal issues for property owners. The subject of land-use regulation can also lead to disputes and litigation, as seen in significant court cases like Kelo v. City of New London.
Step-by-step explanation:
True, the buyer's intended use for the property may indeed be relevant to title defects in noncompliance with municipal land-use bylaws. Municipalities have zoning regulations and restrictions to control and direct the development of property within their jurisdiction. If a buyer's planned use of the property violates those zoning regulations, they may face legal challenges, including issues with title defects, because their use would not be in compliance with the municipal bylaws. This issue becomes particularly important in cases where a property is being transitioned from one type of use to another, such as from agricultural to residential or commercial, which may require a change in zoning.
Property owners must make a detailed declaration of real estate held, which is used as the basis for land-use regulation compliance and taxation. In the case where the City of New London, Connecticut condemned private property for a development plan, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London affirmed that economic development can be considered a 'public use' under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. However, disputes over what constitutes a valid public use or whether certain land-use regulations are overly restrictive can lead to litigation.