Question

Explain the logic behind the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Rochin v. California, 1952, that the deputies in the case had violated the 14 th Amendment’s guarantee of procedural due process. What can you conclude from the fact that the decision was unanimous?

Answer 1

The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Rochin v. California found that the deputies violated the 14th Amendment's guarantee of procedural due process. The decision was unanimous, indicating a strong consensus among the justices.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Rochin v. California, 1952, found that the deputies in the case had violated the 14th Amendment's guarantee of procedural due process. The logic behind this decision was based on the Court's interpretation of the due process clause, which ensures that individuals are treated fairly and impartially by the government. In this case, the Court determined that the deputies' actions in forcibly entering Rochin's home and inducing vomiting to obtain evidence were so shocking and offensive to the conscience that they violated the principles of due process.

The fact that the decision was unanimous indicates that all of the justices, regardless of their individual views or ideologies, agreed that the deputies' actions in this case violated the due process rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. Unanimous decisions carry significant weight and demonstrate a strong consensus among the justices, highlighting the gravity and importance of the legal principles at stake.