Final answer:
Caesaropapism and papal supremacy were conflicting ideas in the governance of the Christian Church. Caesaropapism gave political authority to secular rulers over the church, while papal supremacy believed in the authority of the Pope as the highest spiritual authority.
Step-by-step explanation:
Caesaropapism and papal supremacy were two conflicting ideas in the governance of the Christian Church. Caesaropapism refers to the political authority of a secular ruler over the church, while papal supremacy is the belief in the authority of the Pope as the highest spiritual authority.
The concept of Caesaropapism was at odds with papal supremacy because it placed the ultimate power and control over the church in the hands of secular rulers, rather than the Pope. In caesaropapist systems, rulers held authority over the appointment of bishops and had the power to influence religious practices and doctrines.
This conflicting relationship between secular rulers and the Pope often led to struggles for power and control within the church, as well as disputes over the proper roles and responsibilities of secular and spiritual leaders.