Final answer:
Aristotle argues that the wise person should be angry in specific circumstances, but never excessively, while Seneca believes that anger should be completely destroyed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Aristotle argues that the wise person should be angry in specific circumstances, but never excessively, while Seneca believes that anger should be completely destroyed. So, the statement is false. Aristotle acknowledges that anger can serve as a motivating force in certain situations, such as when it is directed at injustice, but he cautions against excessive anger that can cloud judgment and lead to harm. On the other hand, Seneca asserts that anger is a destructive emotion that should be eradicated, as it causes suffering and disrupts our ability to live virtuous lives.