215k views
2 votes
Which of these is not a difference between Doric and Ionic temple formats?

a. Column height
b. Capital design
c. Number of columns
d. Entablature structure

User LeBigCat
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The number of columns is not a difference between Doric and Ionic temple formats.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is c. Number of columns. Both Doric and Ionic temple formats have differences in column height, capital design, and entablature structure.

Doric Temple Format:

In the Doric order, the columns have a plain capital and rest directly on the stylobate without a base. The column height of Doric temples is usually shorter and more stocky compared to Ionic temples. Doric entablature includes a frieze composed of triglyphs and metopes.

Ionic Temple Format:

In the Ionic order, the columns have a capital design that includes volutes, which are scroll-like ornaments. The column height of Ionic temples is usually taller and more slender compared to Doric temples. Ionic entablature includes a frieze without triglyphs, instead with continuous sculptural relief.

Therefore, the number of columns is not a difference between Doric and Ionic temple formats.

User Letmejustfixthat
by
7.5k points