Final answer:
The given statement "The architects of early Christian churches used spolia columns because there was no money for new ones." is false. Using spolia in Early Christian churches was a choice with symbolic significance beyond financial necessity; it represented continuity and authority while allowing for the creation of vast interior spaces suitable for Christian rites. Option b.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that architects of early Christian churches used spolia columns because there was no money for new ones is not entirely accurate; the practice of using spolia, or repurposed building material from older structures, was common in various cultures and periods, including the Early Christian era. The use of spolia was not solely due to financial constraints but often had symbolic significance, such as establishing continuity with the heritage of the area and preserving the sacredness and charged history of those materials within new architectural frameworks.
In the context of Early Christian churches, the adaptation of older architectural elements like columns can be viewed as a purposeful choice to convey a sense of historical legacy and authority while also employing available resources. Exploiting the opportunities presented by innovations like the true arch, combined with the employment of spolia columns, allowed for the creation of expansive interior spaces suited to Christian worship, which was more focused on the interior and the communal experience than the pagan temples of the past. Option b.