David Hume's argument about making comparisons is rooted in his philosophical exploration of causation and our understanding of cause and effect relationships.
In his empirical approach, Hume asserts that our ideas of causation are derived from observing constant conjunctions of events rather than any inherent necessity in the events themselves.
Regarding comparisons, Hume emphasizes the role of experience and habit in shaping our judgments. He argues that when we make comparisons, we rely on past experiences and associations to draw conclusions about the relationships between objects or events.
Our ability to compare and establish connections is a product of habit and repetition, and our expectations are formed based on the regularities we have observed in the past.
In summary, Hume's argument suggests that our capacity to make comparisons and infer causation is grounded in empirical observations and the habitual associations we form through repeated experiences.