Final answer:
The correct statement regarding Good Samaritan laws is that an individual should not leave the scene of an accident until another competent person can take over. Good Samaritan laws generally provide some protection against civil liability, not an absolute prohibition against lawsuits, and the laws vary on the coverage of volunteers in emergency situations like a summer camp.
Step-by-step explanation:
The appropriate statement by the nurse manager in review of the Good Samaritan laws with a group of newly licensed nurses is A. "If you render aid in an accident, do not leave the scene until another competent person can take over." This reflects the essence of these laws which encourage bystanders to offer reasonable assistance to those in need and to remain with them until sufficient help arrives. Options B and C are incorrect because Good Samaritan laws do not prohibit victims from filing lawsuits—they typically offer some protection against civil liability provided the responder acted in good faith, without gross negligence, and within the scope of their training. There is also no federal law that requires nurses to render aid in emergency situations, so nurses must be familiar with their state's laws regarding duty to act. Option D can be correct in many jurisdictions, as Good Samaritan laws often cover volunteers who provide care in emergency situations, but the exact coverage can vary.
Now, considering the moral scenarios provided:
-
- Flipping the switch is morally permissible given that it results in the lesser of two harms.
-
- Picking up the child is morally obligatory because it is a direct action that can save a life with minimal personal cost.
-
- Taking the healthy person's organs is morally forbidden as it involves the intentional harming of an innocent individual.