Final answer:
Option 1: Friends, enemies is the correct answer, fitting Aristotle's philosophy of seeking what is possible in friendships and recognizing that some honors cannot be reciprocated fully.
Step-by-step explanation:
For friendship seeks what is possible, not what accords with worth, since that is impossible in some cases, as it is with honor to friends and enemies. For no one could ever make a return in accord with their worth, but someone who attends to them as far as he is able seems to be a decent person. Option 1: Friends, enemies is the correct answer to fill in the blanks.
Exploring Aristotle's views on friendship, he emphasizes the importance of perfect friendships, which foster virtuous development and happiness. Such friendships are based on mutual goodwill and the pleasure of witnessing another's well-being, rather than on expectations of utility or pleasure. In contrast to perfect friendships, incidental friendships are casual and largely revolve around what each individual may gain from the relationship.
Aristotle also alludes to the incomparability of certain values, emphasizing that some types of personal worth or contributions, such as honor given to friends and enemies, are beyond full reciprocity or equivalent exchange, rendering the ideal of a balanced honor exchange impossible.