24.8k views
5 votes
"That is why we allow only reason, not a human being, to be a ruler." Which best follows from this statement?

User Bakary
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The statement endorses governance based on reason and aligns with the philosophy of rulers using knowledge and wisdom, a thought common in eighteenth-century enlightenment ideals, contrasting with divine right theories.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement 'That is why we allow only reason, not a human being, to be a ruler' suggests a preference for a form of governance that is guided by rational thought and principles rather than the whims or personal judgments of individual leaders. This idea aligns closely with the notion of a government led by philosophical rulers, as mentioned by Al-Farabi, where leaders use theoretical and practical knowledge to determine the wisdom of actions. It also resonates with eighteenth-century enlightenment thoughts, as outlined in John Locke's work, which emphasized law and reason embedded in nature and the government's role in protecting and improving the well-being of its citizens. The concept can further be contrasted with the divine right theory, where power is seen as granted exclusively by a divine being, an idea that is less reliant on reason and more on tradition and faith.

User Libbux
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.