Final answer:
Aristotle's concept of happiness is not subjective but rather objective, based on the cultivation of virtues and living in accord with one's nature, leading to a state of eudaimonia or flourishing.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question you've asked pertains to Aristotle's perspective on happiness and human freedom. Unlike the modern subjective view that each person is free to pursue their own path to happiness, Aristotle had a more objective approach to what constitutes a happy or flourishing life. He believed that happiness, or eudaimonia, is the ultimate goal (telos) of human life, and it is achieved through the cultivation of virtues. Eudaimonia is not just a passing feeling of joy, but a state of flourishing that involves living in accordance with one's human nature and purpose. Therefore, Aristotle would likely disagree with the subjective notion of happiness prevalent today, arguing instead for a life built on virtue as the path to true happiness.