Final answer:
The term 'complete' is not a non-scriptural view of inspiration as it implies full divine inspiration of religious texts, which is a scriptural perspective. The correct option is D. complete.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question 'Which is not a non-scriptural view of inspiration?' refers to theories of how religious scriptures are understood to have been inspired, and it is a topic related to religious studies, which falls under the broader category of Social Studies.
The options given are A. natural, B. conceptual, C. partial, and D. complete. Among these, the term that is not commonly associated as a non-scriptural view of inspiration is complete. This is because a complete view of inspiration often implies that the texts of scripture are fully inspired by a divine source, which is the scriptural view held by many religious traditions, particularly in reference to their sacred texts. On the other hand, natural, conceptual, and partial views are typically non-scriptural as they suggest the texts derive from human insight or are only partially influenced by the divine.