Final answer:
Trevor Noah's perspectives on government enforcement of laws against race mixing could be inferred to align with historical figures who opposed such discriminatory practices. Antimiscegenation laws, once prominent in the United States, were not overturned until the Supreme Court's Loving v. Virginia case in 1967. These historical measures have shaped the ongoing dialogue about racial equality and civil rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question inquires about Trevor Noah's perspective on government attempts to enforce laws against race mixing. Although there is no direct quote from Trevor Noah mentioned here, one may infer that the discussion likely revolves around historical attitudes and legislative acts often associated with the Jim Crow era and their impact on race relations in the United States. The most notorious examples of these were the antimiscegenation laws which were not overturned until the 1967 Supreme Court case of Loving v. Virginia.
Given the context provided, we can look to the broader historical perspective where prominent figures like Frederick Douglass and others fought for equality and challenged the discrimination and racism inherent in such laws. They contended that America's strength and character came from its diversity and condemned the barriers that prevented races from mixing freely. Laws aimed at preventing interracial marriage and maintaining racial segregation were seen as antithetical to the nation's fundamental values.
Overall, historical attitudes towards race mixing and the enforcement of related laws have been part of a larger struggle for racial equality and civil rights in the US. Conversations about these topics continue to evolve as society reflects on its history and aspirations for a more equitable future.