Final answer:
The resolution of Samuel Beckett's Endgame differs from a typical drama resolution because it may leave the central conflict unresolved, creating a sense of continuity rather than closure, and often ends with all characters in a static state, which is a hallmark of the Theatre of the Absurd.
Step-by-step explanation:
The resolution of Endgame by Samuel Beckett is different from a typical resolution in drama because it seems to defy traditional expectations. In a typical resolution, or dénouement, all loose ends are tied up, and the central conflict is resolved, often returning to a state of normalcy, albeit sometimes changed. Endgame, characteristic of the Theatre of the Absurd, often leaves its audience with mindset of unresolved conflict and a minimalist, apocalyptic vision that defies clear resolution. Instead of achieving a neat conclusion, Beckett's play may leave important questions unanswered, creating a sense of continuity rather than closure. This can also be seen in the way classic drama narratives, like Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House, may avoid simplistic tragic endings, focusing more on the journey of the characters and the psychological aspects rather than an act of violence or death.
In contrast to other plays where the conflict is ultimately resolved (either fully or partially), and the characters may experience personal growth or change, Endgame potentially ends with all characters in a static state, adding to the feeling of existential bleakness and ambiguity characteristic of the Absurd Stage.