191k views
4 votes
12000 cash at bank decreased 3500 cash a bank suggesting liquidity has fallen, state 2 reasons why this assertion could be incorrect?

User Carlos ABS
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

A $3,500 decrease in the bank's cash position does not necessarily indicate a fall in liquidity; it could be due to strategic asset allocation or income-generating loan issuance. Bank balance sheets include loans as assets, showing that not all deposited cash is kept in reserves due to the principles of fractional reserve banking.

Step-by-step explanation:

Although a decrease of $3,500 cash at bank might suggest that liquidity has fallen, this assertion could be incorrect for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the reduction in cash could be due to a strategic decision by the bank to invest in high-liquidity assets like Treasury bonds, which could easily be converted back to cash. Secondly, the decrease in cash could also be a result of the bank issuing more loans, which is typically how banks generate income through interest. If these loans are performing well and there is a low risk of default, the bank's financial position and liquidity might actually be stronger despite having less cash on hand.

Assets listed on a bank balance sheet may not actually be in the form of cash because banks operate on a fractional reserve banking system. Banks are required to hold a minimum amount of reserves, but they can loan out the remainder of the deposits they receive. In the scenario provided, Singleton Bank has $1 million in reserves, but has extended a $9 million loan to Hank's Auto Supply, with total deposits still standing at $10 million. This illustrates how banks create loans which are accounted for as assets, despite not physically having the full amount of deposited cash on hand.

User Ariful Islam
by
8.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.