Final answer:
The value of an actor's contract today, based on a rational negotiation scenario, might be as low as $1, reflecting a strategic approach where the player expects any small amount to be accepted over getting nothing. However, in practice, factors like fairness or cooperative norms might influence a higher offer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to the economic concepts involved in negotiating contracts, which can be applied to the value of an actor's contract. In the scenario provided, Player A (presumably acting as an agent or actor in the situation) is expected to offer an amount to Player B. If both are entirely rational and self-interested, as per game theory, Player A would likely offer a minimal amount, such as $1, since Player B would prefer even a small payment over receiving nothing. However, this assumes a perfectly rational world. In practice, negotiations may differ based on other factors, such as fairness or cooperative behavior, thus departing from the purely strategic approach of providing the lowest possible offer. A fair and typical offer might be a 50-50 split, but actual contract negotiations could result in a wide range of outcomes.