Final answer:
A supporter of Rosa's view may argue that the everyday consumption of raw meats in various cultures implies the existence of effective safety measures, which counter Tessa's concern about raw meats universally necessitating cooking. They would point out that safety is also about selecting trusted sources, safe handling, along with monitoring produce-related outbreaks.
Step-by-step explanation:
A person who agrees with Rosa might argue against Tessa's interpretation of the fact by pointing out that raw fish and beef are consumed regularly in many cultures and do not cause widespread health issues. This suggests that there are safe practices in place to minimize the risk of foodborne illnesses like E. coli and salmonella. Such practices include sourcing from reputable suppliers, proper handling, and in some cases, using ingredients like acidity and salinity to reduce bacterial growth in dishes like sushi and ceviche. However, it's also essential to recognize that primarily produce-related outbreaks have been linked to foods like raw spinach and vegetable sprouts contaminated by animal waste, showing that all raw foods have some risk.
While Tessa is correct that thorough cooking can kill harmful bacteria, it is not the only measure to prevent foodborne illnesses. Cultures that traditionally consume raw meats often rely on meticulous selection and preparation standards to ensure food safety. These methods, along with awareness of local food safety alerts and proper hygiene, allow for the safe consumption of these dishes.