Question

Those on which they were acting.–dred scott v. sandford,supreme court of the united stateshow does taney use this appeal to emotion to support his argument?the appeal praises the virtues of the writers of the document taney uses as evidence.the appeal relies on his original claim that dred scott is not a citizen and cannot sue in a federal court.the appeal counters taney’s claim that people’s origins dictate their status in the community.the appeal creates doubt about the validity and soundness of the constitution in terms of defining citizenship..

What type of fallacy or faulty reasoning is used in this passage?
A. Ad Populum
B. Begging the Claim
C. Genetic Fallacy
D. Hasty Generalization

Answer 1

Chief Justice Taney's ruling that Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was not considered a citizen showcases the Genetic Fallacy (option C), where the argument is based on origin rather than merit.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, Chief Justice Roger Taney's ruling that Dred Scott, an enslaved African American man, was not a citizen and therefore incapable of suing for his freedom in federal court is considered to be an example of faulty reasoning.

This decision is also known for its impact on the understanding of citizenship and the protection of slavery within the Constitution. Taney's ruling falls under what is recognized as the Genetic Fallacy, which is a type of fallacy where a claim is accepted or rejected based on its origin rather than its merit. In this case, Taney argued that the framers of the Constitution never intended for African Americans to be citizens, and thus, Scott had no standing in court.