142k views
2 votes
Although frank o’hara had little formal training in painting, he became an important curator at the metropolitan museum of art and often wrote about the relationship between painting and poetry. A. True

B. False

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The claim about Frank O'Hara becoming a curator and writing about painting and poetry is false based on the provided references. The references detail other artists' work but do not support the statement about O'Hara's achievements in the art world. B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that Frank O'Hara had little formal training in painting, became an important curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and wrote about the relationship between painting and poetry is, according to your preferences, false.

While various artists such as Frank Stella, Helen Frankenthaler, Frank Norris, and Bruce Nauman have made significant contributions to art and its intersection with other disciplines, there is no mention of Frank O'Hara fitting this description.

Artists and critics like Stella and Norris have explored such intersections in their work and writings, yet Frank O'Hara's role in such contexts is not evident from the provided references. It is crucial to note the importance of factual accuracy, especially when relating to contributions in the art world and historical figures.

User Walter A
by
8.5k points

Related questions

asked Feb 9, 2024 231k views
Ayaz Aslam asked Feb 9, 2024
by Ayaz Aslam
8.9k points
1 answer
5 votes
231k views
asked Nov 13, 2024 29.1k views
Peterflynn asked Nov 13, 2024
by Peterflynn
7.9k points
1 answer
2 votes
29.1k views