163k views
0 votes
Ruby claims to have correctly solved 3 ( x 4 ) = 1 − ( 2 x − 9 ) using the steps below. step 1: 3 x 12 = 1 − ( 2 x − 9 ) step 2: 3 x 12 = 1 − 2 x − 9 step 3: 3 x 12 = − 8 − 2 x step 4: 5 x 12 = − 8 step 5: 5 x = − 20 step 6: x = − 4 one of ruby’s steps contains a mistake. which step is incorrect? A. Step 1

B. Step 2
C. Step 3
D. Step 4

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The mistake in Ruby's steps lies in Step 2, where the negative sign was not correctly distributed, failing to change -9 to +9 after removing the parentheses.

Step-by-step explanation:

You have identified an error in Ruby's solution to the equation 3 ( x 4 ) = 1 - ( 2 x - 9 ). To find the mistake, let's review her steps:

  1. Step 1: 3 x 12 = 1 - ( 2 x - 9 )
  2. Step 2: 3 x 12 = 1 - 2 x + 9
  3. Step 3: 3 x 12 = 10 - 2 x
  4. Step 4: 5 x 12 = 10
  5. Step 5: 5 x = - 2
  6. Step 6: x = -4

The mistake is in Step 2. When distributing the negative sign inside the parentheses, the -9 should become +9, not remain -9. The correct Step 2 should read 3 x 12 = 1 - 2 x + 9. Therefore, the incorrect step is Step 2, which means the answer is B. Step 2.

User Baksteen
by
7.9k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.