162k views
0 votes
The theory of the unitary executive suggests that congress has little power to restrain policy making by the president and executive branch. supporters of this theory often point to the vesting clause in the constitution as suggesting all executive power belongs to the president to control the executive branch with only those few exceptions listed in the constitution. critics argue that the constitution provides congress with – over the executive, including congressional oversight, the power to appropriate funds, and to regulate commerce.

a)True
b)False

User Shub
by
7.2k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Social Studies The theory of the unitary executive posits that the president holds all executive power, based on the vesting clause in the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is Social Studies.

The theory of the unitary executive argues for broad presidential control over the executive branch, citing the Constitution's vesting clause. Critics highlight Congress's constitutional powers, including oversight and funding, which act as checks on the presidency. The balance of power is an intended feature of the U.S. government's design with shared authority among separated institutions.

The theory of the unitary executive posits that the president holds all executive power, based on the vesting clause in the Constitution. Supporters suggest this grants broad authority over the executive branch with limited congressional intervention. Critics, however, argue that the Constitution provides Congress with significant powers—such as oversight, funding appropriations, and commerce regulation—to serve as a check on the executive branch.

Historically, the presidency was envisioned as a strong yet checked role. Over time, presidents have sought to expand their inherent powers, with the executive branch accruing more power, but this expansion is balanced by congressional powers, such as the veto override and legislative authority.

Though the debate over executive power persists, it's clear that the founding fathers intended for a government of separated institutions sharing powers, with checks and balances ensuring no single branch becomes too powerful.

User Picrap
by
7.3k points