85.5k views
5 votes
Match the arguments with the tiles explaining why each one is invalid based on the evidence presented. Tiles- No evidence -poorly organized evidence- denies evidence that contradicts the claim pairs- expanded federal power has led to only peace and prosperity - fdr was a socialist who harmed this country - expanded federal power is how we got to the moon and how we won world war ii.

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The arguments discussed in the question are analyzed and matched with the tiles explaining why each one is invalid based on the evidence presented.

Step-by-step explanation:

The arguments discussed in the question are:

  1. Expanded federal power has led to only peace and prosperity
  2. FDR was a socialist who harmed this country
  3. Expanded federal power is how we got to the moon and how we won World War II

Now, let's match each argument with the tile explaining why it is invalid based on the evidence presented:

  • No evidence: The argument that expanded federal power has led to only peace and prosperity lacks evidence to support it.
  • Denies evidence that contradicts the claim: The argument that FDR was a socialist who harmed this country denies evidence that contradicts it, such as the success of his New Deal programs.
  • Poorly organized evidence: The argument that expanded federal power is how we got to the moon and how we won World War II is based on evidence, but it is poorly organized and does not make a clear case.

User Dur
by
8.1k points